Tuesday, December 22, 2009

I don't know if you want to even bother reading this article..

Are you kidding me? They are stating that dogs are leaving a worse 'carbon footprint' than SUV's! Their poop is toxic and cat's are worse they state. No one had anything else better with their time then to calculate this? I think most of us pick up the doggie poop and don't let it run into the streams and lakes to kill the fishies and birds..right? And they suggest hens and rabbits as pets...well bc in the end you can eat them...ok sorry for a waste of your time..back to wrapping presents :)


Miss Ferret said...

I read that too. It's a little disturbing. They could at least write an article that would make more sense...like the Copenhagen deal or something.

Happy holidays!

Kari in WeHo said...

i thinking they are missing the fact in that dogs were around long before SUVs... but Im with you back to holiday wrapping?

CarrieBeth said...

Instead of encouraging people to not have pets or eat their pets (Gross!), how about encouraging the to not eat animals? Factory farming is the worst contributer to green house gases.